Choosing Monte Carlo or a binomial tree
Question
When is Monte Carlo the better pricing method, and when is a binomial (or other lattice) method preferable?
Short answer
Trees for low-dimensional problems with early exercise; Monte Carlo for high-dimensional or strongly path-dependent payoffs. A lattice handles American exercise naturally and gives fast, smooth prices and Greeks, but its cost explodes with the number of factors. Monte Carlo's error shrinks like independently of dimension and copes easily with path dependence (Asians, baskets, LMM), but early exercise needs extra machinery such as Longstaff-Schwartz and Greeks are noisier.
Adapted from Joshi, Denson & Downes, Quant Job Interview Questions and Answers, Q2.55, p.21; question and answer rewritten by SelfMadeQuant.com.
See the hint and the full worked solution in the question bank (free account).
Open the worked solutionLessons behind this question
- American Options and Early Exercise
- Applications — Monte Carlo Estimation, Error, and Confidence Intervals
- The One-Period Binomial Model: Replication, Delta Hedging, and Risk-Neutral Pricing
Start with a free lesson: Basic Statistics and Regression is part of a free topic. Create a free account, no card needed, to read it in full with worked solutions.
Read it free