Skip to content
Quantitative Risk Management / Portfolio Credit Risk and Credit Derivatives

Overview

When a bank holds a loan book of 5,000 corporate obligors, the single-name tools from Topic 7 are insufficient. The central question is no longer "what is the probability that firm ii defaults?" but "what is the distribution of the number of defaults — or total loss — across the whole portfolio?" The answer depends critically on default dependence: two firms in the same industry facing the same recession tend to default together, which thickens the right tail of the loss distribution far beyond what independent defaults would produce (Figure 11.1 of QRM illustrates this vividly: a 0.5% default correlation roughly doubles the probability of 30+ defaults in a 1,000-loan portfolio).

Two complementary modelling frameworks handle this:

  • Threshold (latent variable) models: each obligor ii defaults if a latent "credit quality" variable XiX_i falls below a threshold did_i. The joint default distribution is determined by the copula of (X1,…,Xm)(X_1,\ldots,X_m). The Gaussian threshold model — a multivariate extension of Merton's structural model — is the industry standard and the basis of the Basel IRB capital formula.
  • Bernoulli mixture models: obligors share common macro factors Ψ\Psi; conditional on Ψ\Psi, defaults are independent. Unconditional dependence arises through the shared factor — a recession raises every firm's conditional PD simultaneously. The probit-normal and logit-normal mixing distributions encompass the Gaussian threshold model as a special case.

For large portfolios, the Gordy-Vasicek asymptotics show that the α\alpha-quantile of the relative loss converges to ℓˉ(qα(Ψ))\bar\ell(q_\alpha(\Psi)) — the loss at the α\alpha-quantile of the macro factor. This single-factor ASRF result is the derivation behind the Basel IRB formula RCi=cδiei Φ ⁣(Φ−1(pi)+βi Φ−1(0.999)1−βi)\text{RC}_i = c\delta_i e_i\,\Phi\!\left(\frac{\Phi^{-1}(p_i)+\sqrt{\beta_i}\,\Phi^{-1}(0.999)}{\sqrt{1-\beta_i}}\right).

For computing tail risk in realistic heterogeneous portfolios, importance sampling (exponential tilting) on the factor Ψ\Psi provides a variance-reduction strategy that makes 99.9% VaR and ES estimates tractable. The topic closes with CDOs and the Gaussian copula correlation smile — the 2008 failure of treating correlation as a parameter to be implied from tranche prices.

By the end of this topic you should be able to:

  • define a threshold model and state Lemma 11.2 (equivalence criterion: same marginals + same copula);
  • set up the Gaussian threshold model with factor structure and compute default correlations;
  • define a Bernoulli mixture model and verify that the Gaussian threshold model is a probit-normal mixture;
  • derive the Vasicek large-portfolio loss distribution and its VaR limit;
  • state the Basel IRB formula and trace each term to the ASRF derivation;
  • explain exponential tilting (importance sampling) and how it shifts the factor distribution to oversample bad states;
  • describe a CDO tranche, compute the tranche loss, and state why the Gaussian copula fails for super-senior tranches.

In this lesson

  1. Contents
  2. The big picture

The full lesson is for members.

Read the full lesson

New to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Quantitative Risk Management syllabus.