Every optimiser in Note 4 consumed a covariance matrix ; this note explains where it comes from. The raw problem is hopeless — a 2,000-stock universe has over two million covariances to estimate — and the industry's answer is structure: assume returns are driven by a modest number of common factors plus independent stock-specific noise, and the covariance matrix collapses to . The derivation is two lines of covariance algebra; the substance is in the three rival calibration philosophies (macroeconomic, fundamental, statistical) — which quantity you fix and which you estimate — and in their trade-offs, which explain why the fundamental approach (Barra, Axioma) dominates production risk systems.
Learning objectives. By the end of this note you should be able to:
- state the linear factor model and its two independence assumptions;
- derive and quantify the dimension-reduction benefit;
- describe all three calibration approaches, including the four-step fundamental procedure with its WLS refinements;
- give the pros/cons triangle (intuitive vs meaningful vs adaptive);
- decompose portfolio variance into systematic and specific parts;
- explain the linear-vs-log-return convention.
In this lesson
- 3.1 Risk and uncertainty
- 3.2 Linear factor models / APT
- 3.3 Three calibration approaches
- 3.4 Portfolio variance under the factor model
The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Portfolio Theory and Quantitative Investment syllabus.