Renaissance Technology's Sharpe ratio jumped from 2 to 6+ not because the signals improved, but because portfolio construction improved. The mapping from expected return to position size is where most of the economic value of a good thesis is either captured or destroyed. This note develops the four sizing heuristics a fundamental equity PM can apply with standard analytical tools — no optimizer required — and presents the empirical evidence that the simplest rule (proportional to expected return) outperforms mean-variance optimization in practice.
In this lesson
- The Sharpe ratio as the PM's objective
- Constructing expected returns
- The four sizing rules
- Why proportional beats mean-variance in practice
- From ideas to factor-neutral positions
- GMV scaling and leverage
Before you start
- From Thesis to Position: The Practitioner Alpha Pipeline
- Factor Taxonomy for Equity Long-Short Books
- Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures
The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Portfolio Theory and Quantitative Investment syllabus.