The critical insight is distributional: consensus earnings forecasts are already incorporated into stock prices by the time an analyst reads them. Earning an excess return from earnings analysis requires one of three things — being more accurate than the market consensus, forecasting changes in the consensus before they occur, or identifying firms where the consensus is systematically biased in a predictable direction.
Two empirical regularities frame this lesson: (1) past earnings growth predicts future growth barely better than chance — the "growth stock" label is mostly a projection bias; (2) analyst consensus long-term earnings growth forecasts are systematically upward-biased, and stocks priced to reflect that bias subsequently underperform.
- state the evidence on what perfect earnings knowledge is worth and the three ranked sources of earnings alpha;
- summarise the economy-industry-firm decomposition of earnings variance;
- describe the two competing models of the earnings process (mean reversion vs random walk) and the empirical evidence;
- explain analyst forecast bias (optimism and inefficiency) and its connection to the value/growth anomaly;
- describe the forecast error decomposition and its practical implications.
In this lesson
-
- Why earnings matter for stock prices
-
- Economy, industry, and firm influences on earnings
-
- Time-series properties of earnings
-
- Analyst forecast bias
-
- Connecting earnings forecasting to the value/growth anomaly
Before you start
The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Portfolio Theory and Quantitative Investment syllabus.