Skip to content
Portfolio Theory and Quantitative Investment / CAPM and Equilibrium Models

Overview

Every discounted-cash-flow valuation, every cost-of-capital calculation, every hurdle rate set in corporate finance depends on one number: the expected return on equity. That number comes from an equilibrium model. The dominant model for the last 60 years — used by textbooks, regulators, and practitioners from equity analysts to infrastructure project teams — is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Its central claim is a single equation:

Rˉi−RF=βi(Rˉm−RF)\bar{R}_i - R_F = \beta_i(\bar{R}_m - R_F)

Every stock's expected excess return equals its beta times the market risk premium. Idiosyncratic risk earns nothing — because diversification is free and any investor who holds the market portfolio has already eliminated it. Beta, the sensitivity of a stock's return to the market, is the only relevant risk measure.

The index models studied in the previous topic were statistical simplifications of the covariance structure. This topic asks a different question: if all investors optimise in the mean-variance sense and have identical expectations, what does equilibrium look like? The answer is the CAPM. The statistical single-index structure and the equilibrium pricing model share the same beta, but they come from different starting points.

This topic tracks the full arc of this theory:

  1. International diversification — broadening the investment opportunity set across currencies and markets as a pre-cursor to thinking globally about the market portfolio.
  2. The Capital Market Line and Separation Theorem — the role of the riskless asset in collapsing the efficient frontier to a single ray; two-fund separation.
  3. CAPM and the Security Market Line — deriving the SML and showing that beta is the only priced risk factor.
  4. Derivation — CAPM from Portfolio Theory — the rigorous mathematical derivation from Lagrangian optimality conditions.
  5. Non-standard CAPM forms — relaxing the standard assumptions: zero-beta CAPM (no riskless asset), taxation, heterogeneous expectations, multi-beta CAPMs.
  6. Empirical tests and Roll's Critique — the Fama-MacBeth methodology, the empirical failure to find a clean beta-return relationship, and Roll's (1977) devastating critique that the CAPM is impossible to test.
  7. Arbitrage Pricing Theory — Ross's alternative: no-arbitrage pricing under a multi-factor structure, without requiring the market portfolio or homogeneous expectations.

In this lesson

  1. Learning objectives
  2. Contents
  3. The big picture

The full lesson is for members.

Read the full lesson

New to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Portfolio Theory and Quantitative Investment syllabus.