A derivatives desk pricing a 10-year Bermudan swaption needs a model that simultaneously (a) prices all vanilla bonds consistently with the observed swap curve and (b) generates realistic rate dynamics for the exercise boundary simulation. The Vasicek model fails (a): three parameters cannot fit 30+ market bond prices. The Ho-Lee model fails (b): zero mean reversion means the long end is as volatile as the short end, which distorts the Bermudan's exercise boundary. Hull and White (1990) resolve both problems by making the Vasicek long-run mean a deterministic function of time: is calibrated date by date to exactly fit the initial forward curve, while the mean reversion speed and volatility retain their Vasicek role of governing the dynamics.
Learning objectives. By the end of this note you should be able to:
- write down the Hull-White SDE and identify the role of each parameter;
- state the calibration formula for in terms of the initial forward curve and model parameters;
- decompose and identify the deterministic shift ;
- state the Hull-White bond price formula with expressed in closed form and expressed in terms of market prices;
- price a European bond option using the Jamshidian-type formula;
- articulate the key differences among Ho-Lee, Vasicek, and Hull-White.
In this lesson
-
- The Hull-White SDE
-
- Bond price formula
-
- European bond option pricing
-
- Hull-White in the trio: Ho-Lee, Vasicek, Hull-White
-
- Trinomial tree implementation
Before you start
- The Vasicek Model: Mean Reversion, Affine Bond Prices, and the Gaussian Distribution
- Normally Distributed Rates and the Ho-Lee Model: Time-Dependent Drift
- Derivation — Vasicek Bond Price via the Term-Structure PDE and Affine Riccati ODEs
The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Fixed Income and Interest-Rate Models syllabus.