The local volatility and stochastic volatility branches of the unit answer the same question — "what generates the smile?" — from opposite directions. Local vol encodes the surface in a deterministic function and fits vanilla prices exactly but predicts unrealistic forward smiles. Stochastic vol (Heston, SABR) generates realistic dynamics and calibrates approximately. This topic is about the synthesis: the local-stochastic volatility (SLV) model, which achieves exact surface calibration and realistic dynamics by multiplying a Heston-type process by a deterministic leverage function chosen via Gyöngy's theorem. After SLV, the topic surveys rough volatility, the research-frontier extension that replaces the Brownian driver in the variance process with a fractional Brownian motion () and achieves dramatically better fits to short-dated smiles.
The mathematical glue is Gyöngy's theorem: any Itô process has the same one-dimensional marginal distributions as a Markov diffusion whose squared diffusion coefficient is the conditional expectation of instantaneous variance. In finance this says any stochastic vol model calibrated to a surface is vanilla-equivalent to the local vol model extracted from that surface — a fact that explains both why local vol works for vanillas and why it fails for path-dependent products.
By the end of this topic you should be able to:
- state Gyöngy's theorem and derive the SLV leverage constraint ;
- write the SLV SDE, describe how shapes the forward smile, and compare SLV against pure LV and pure SV;
- explain the Fokker–Planck calibration procedure for and identify the numerical challenges;
- describe the rough Bergomi model, explain why fits short-dated smiles, and sketch a simulation scheme.
In this lesson
- Contents
- The big picture
The full lesson is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Advanced Derivatives and Exotic Options syllabus.