The stochastic integral is always a local martingale (see Extension to Local Martingales). But it is a true martingale only when . This gap between local martingale and true martingale has concrete consequences: when the diffusion coefficient of an SDE is large enough relative to the state, the solution process loses probability mass to infinity — it is a non-negative local martingale but not a true martingale.
The Bessel process is the canonical example. In dimension , the distance from the origin of a -dimensional Brownian motion satisfies — the Bessel- process. The process (the reciprocal) is a local martingale that is not a true martingale: (probability "leaks to infinity"). In finance, this phenomenon appears in leveraged strategies where the variance grows faster than linearly — and explains why naive Black-Scholes delta-hedging can fail for strategies with unbounded leverage.
Learning objectives. By the end of this note you should be able to:
- State the Bessel process SDE and identify the parameter for the Bessel- connection.
- State and apply Proposition 4.2.1 (explosion criterion: vs. ).
- Show that (for 3D Bessel) is a local martingale but not a true martingale.
- Identify the "probability leak" phenomenon and explain why .
- Connect this to finance: leverage-induced explosion in highly-levered ETF models.
In this lesson
- The Bessel Process
- The Reciprocal Bessel Process — A Non-Martingale Local Martingale
- Finance Application: Leverage-Induced Explosion
Before you start
- Stochastic Differential Equations: Strong and Weak Solutions
- Extension to Local Martingales and Itô Processes
The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.
Read the full lessonNew to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or explore the curriculum.