Skip to content

The Strong Law of Large Numbers

The weak law of large numbers guarantees that for large nn, the probability of a significant deviation between MnM_n and μ\mu is small — but it says nothing about whether such deviations, however individually unlikely, might still recur infinitely often over the entire infinite sequence. The strong law of large numbers closes this gap with a fundamentally different, stronger notion of convergence: almost-sure convergence, which guarantees that (with probability exactly 11) MnM_n genuinely converges to μ\mu as a single infinite realisation unfolds — not just that deviations become improbable at each fixed nn, but that the sequence, followed all the way out, actually settles down. The lesson closes with a sharp example distinguishing the two convergence notions: a sequence that converges in probability but not almost surely.
Learning objectives. By the end of this note you should be able to:
  • state the strong law of large numbers and explain the difference from the weak law in your own words;
  • define almost-sure convergence and contrast it with convergence in probability;
  • verify almost-sure convergence for a monotone sequence using a direct argument;
  • construct or recognise an example where convergence in probability holds but almost-sure convergence fails.

In this lesson

  1. The strong law
  2. Almost-sure convergence
  3. When the converse fails: a genuinely subtle counterexample

Before you start

The full lesson, with worked examples and exercise solutions, is for members.

Read the full lesson

New to SelfMadeQuant.com? See membership options or browse the Probability, Statistics and Financial Data syllabus.