Why capped puts and uncapped calls cost the same
Question
With zero interest rates, an at-the-money European call can pay off without limit, whereas the matching at-the-money put can pay at most the strike. Show that the two nevertheless have the same price, and explain why this is not a paradox.
Short answer
Parity with and gives . Pricing uses the risk-neutral mean , so expected upside above must equal expected downside below it. The lognormal distribution is right-skewed: the call's large gains come with small probability, while moderate declines below are more likely, and the two expectations balance exactly.
Adapted from Crack, Heard on the Street, Q2.3, p.23; question and answer rewritten by SelfMadeQuant.com.
See the hint and the full worked solution in the question bank (free account).
Open the worked solutionLessons behind this question
- No-Arbitrage Bounds and Put-Call Parity
- Option Mechanics: Calls, Puts, Moneyness, Intrinsic Value, and Exchange vs. OTC Markets
- Option Trading Strategies: Spreads, Combinations, and Payoff Engineering
Start with a free lesson: Options is part of a free topic. Create a free account, no card needed, to read it in full with worked solutions.
Read it free