You can postpone formal measure theory for a first pass. A better readiness test is whether you can explain why tomorrow's fair coin toss still has mean zero after you learn today's result. That single distinction between unconditional and conditional averages will do more for you in the first weeks than memorising a list of distributions.
What you should be able to do first
Work through the prerequisites in this order, using a question to check each one.
- Calculus. Approximate near zero as . Can you explain when keeping the squared term improves the approximation?
- Probability. If is standard normal, explain why has mean and variance . Can you compute both from their definitions?
- Conditional expectation. For a random walk, compute the expected value at step given every move up to step . Can you explain why independence matters?
- Random walks and limits. Divide one unit of time into steps. Give each move size and verify that the sum of independent moves has variance one.
- Continuous time. Read the Brownian increment law and quadratic variation before tackling the statement of Itô's lemma.
For proofs in a graduate course, add sigma-algebras, measurability, integrability, and convergence in probability or in mean square. For a first pricing simulation, elementary versions of the ideas above are enough to begin. The two tracks can grow together as exercises demand more precision.
One random walk that tests three prerequisites
Take four independent symmetric steps of size . The total displacement has variance . Given the first two steps, the expected final displacement is , because the remaining steps each have mean zero. The sum of squared moves is on every path, even if the final displacement is zero.
Now try with step size . The variance at the final time stays one, and so does the sum of squared moves. Smaller individual moves can still produce a nonzero total of squared changes. That observation prepares you for Brownian quadratic variation, even though Brownian increments themselves are Gaussian.