Why conditioning twice on nested information collapses
Let and . The variable is -measurable. For any , we also have , so the defining property of conditional expectation gives
An option expires in one of four states. A signal reveals the regime, calm or turbulent. Full information distinguishes every state.
| State | Probability | Regime | Payoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.15 | Calm | 0 |
| 2 | 0.45 | Calm | 4 |
| 3 | 0.30 | Turbulent | 2 |
| 4 | 0.10 | Turbulent | 12 |
Let be full information, the regime information, and the payoff. Compute the conditional expectation before the exact state is revealed, then average over the regimes.
First, . Conditional on calm, state 2 has probability , so the payoff expectation is . Conditional on turbulent, the expectation is . Thus is the random variable that equals in calm states and in turbulent states. Finally,
Directly weighting the original payoffs by their four state probabilities gives the same . If you observe the calm regime, the relevant conditional answer is . If you know only the initial probabilities, the relevant unconditional answer is .
Within the calm regime, divide each calm state's original probability by the total calm probability before multiplying by its payoff. The weights must sum to one inside the regime. To recover the unconditional expectation, multiply the two regime means by their respective regime probabilities. Each regime probability cancels the normalisation within that regime, returning the original state weights. This is the tower identity as arithmetic. If the two information sets are not nested, that cancellation does not in general describe the successive conditional expectations.