Proving a Discounted Stock Price Is a Risk-Neutral Martingale
Original question
I'm trying to prove that a discounted asset price is a martingale under the risk-neutral measure. What steps should I follow?
Express the asset's dynamics under the risk-neutral measureQ, divide its price by the money-market account, and verify that the result is a true martingale. In a no-dividend constant-coefficient model with risk-free rater and volatilityσ, the discounted price is
e−rtSt=S0eσWtQ−21σ2t.
It has conditional expected growth of one by independence of the future Brownian increment and its normal moment-generating function.
Discount the traded value and verify the conditional mean
Assume dSt=rStdt+σStdWtQ with S0>0. The discount factor is deterministic and of finite variation, so the product rule yields
d(e−rtSt)=e−rtdSt−re−rtStdt=σe−rtStdWtQ.
This shows that the discounted process S is a local martingale. To prove the stronger claim, solve the driftless geometric SDE or use its exponential representation. At any s<t,
The process is adapted, and its finite-time first moments equal S0. You could alternatively verify EQ∫0Tσ2Su2du<∞, which ensures its stochastic integral is a true martingale on the finite interval.
To verify the martingale directly, write the discounted stock at t as its value at s times e−σ2(t−s)/2+σ(WtQ−WsQ). The second factor is independent of the information at s and has mean one by the Gaussian exponential moment. This checks both why the discounted value is fair under Q and why the undiscounted conditional mean still grows at r. When the asset pays dividends, the traded gains include those cash flows and the same statement requires accounting for them.
For an original exercise, assume r=0.04 and σ=0.25, and suppose S0.5=108 is observed. Then EQ[S1∣F0.5]=108e0.02≈110.18. Multiplying by e−0.04 gives 108e−0.02≈105.86, precisely the discounted time-0.5 value. In units of time 0.5, the equivalent equality is S0.5=e−0.02EQ[S1∣F0.5].
For a stock with continuous proportional dividend yieldq, the ex-dividend price drifts at r−q under Q. In that case the martingale is the discounted gain process, e−rtSt+∫0te−ruqSudu. The dividend integral offsets the negative −q drift of the discounted ex-dividend price.
A deterministic time-varying rate works similarly. Replace ert by exp(∫0trudu) and use rtSt as the drift under Q. The product rule removes the local rate at each instant.
Interactive example
Turn a fair random walk into a biased one
Start at zero. Each independent step adds 1 on heads and subtracts 1 on tails. Compare expected change with the variability of a single walk.